NASA-HDBK-4001: “Electrical Grounding Architecture for Unmanned Spacecraft”

I have long complained that the word “grounding” means too many things in electrical engineering. It can mean (1) A connection to Earth/dirt; (2) A current return path; or (3) A voltage/potential reference. At least in this publicly available NASA document (free to download here) we don’t have to worry about meaning #1–there’s no way we’re connecting a spacecraft to the dirt back on Earth. This guidance document from 1998 has useful information for anyone looking at implementing “grounding” (both in terms of (2) and (3)) on a mobile platform with largely conductive structure.

Although fairly concise at 29 pages, 4001 covers a lot of ground (pardon the pun). It acknowledges up front that there’s no single “correct” grounding approach, and it covers which design considerations are most important in designing a grounding architecture. It approaches grounding design from the systems perspective, largely looking at the connections between modules. I find the conceptual diagrams to be particularly helpful, such as the ones highlighting power distribution and signals below.

Grounding power distribution system
Grounding for signals/data bus on spacecraft

Topics addressed in NASA-HDBK-4001:

  • Ground isolation and ground loops

  • Different requirements for different frequencies of interest

  • Single point ground (SPG or “star” grounding) vs. multiple point ground

  • Bleed resistors

  • Bonding

  • Different requirements depending on platform size

  • Grounding for sensors, RF systems, pyro devices, etc.

  • Ground fault isolation

  • It also shows a fascinating example in the appendix drawn from the Cassini mission of what this kind of grounding architecture looks like on a large and complex spacecraft

 

TIP:

NASA-HDBK-4001 calls out MIL-B-5087B for bonding guidance, but today the recommendation would be to refer to NASA-HDBK-4003. The latter document had not yet been written in 1998 when 4001 was first published. 

 

Designing in appropriate grounding for complex systems is such a large topic that it’s not captured in many other standards. While its main applicability is to a very specific set of hardware, NASA-HDBK-4001 is a good starting point for people outside of NASA and outside of aerospace who are having to make grounding-related design decisions.


Categories:

ANSI | CISPR | FCC | IEC | ISO | IEEE | MIL-STD | NASA | SAE | OTHER

Previous
Previous

ANSI C63.16: “Guide for Electrostatic Discharge Test Methodologies and Acceptance Criteria for Electronic Equipment”

Next
Next

IEEE 299 and 299.1 on Measuring the Shielding Effectiveness of Enclosures